Important Notice

12/6/2025

Please note that ISPS will be operating from Australia until the fall-out from the Aid Agency closures by DOGE is resolved. This is estimated to be in the last quarter of 2026.

Most of those closures, as most enlightened and attentive researchers now know, were necessary because of wastage, misappropriation, corruption, and nefarious actions such as creating and funding terrorist organizations like ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and Boko Haram. Also for inculcating ideologies that conflict with the beliefs of the majority population demographics of certain countries, such as the promotion and inculcation of LGBT agendas and the unscientifically based gender dysphoria.

Certain countries also need time to reposition in light of the exposure of and departure from what is now widely accepted as international corporate and politically driven scams such as Net Zero 2030/50, Global Warming based on CO₂ emissions (which is based on “consensus” science funded by the scamsters and their political accomplices, as opposed to real science). Since these views are now supported by the vast majority of the world’s populations such as China, India, Argentina, Many EU and BRICS countries, Climate Change strategies will henceforth need to address misguided patented geoengineering techniques like Atmospheric Aerosol Injection, HAARP, and HEW’s instead.

As a result, responsible administrations, investors, informed jurists, and consultancies such as this one will be addressing those issues with properly grounded and well-informed investors backing actually sustainable projects vested with real and workable visions for the effective upliftment of humankind.

As a result, please use the mobile number +61 452 578 992 until further notice.

2 Comments

Izak Labuschagne link

12/7/2025 00:49:35

When I employed AI to edit this Notice, it tried to water it down instead.

My question to it was

“Why must AI always try to proselytize its users into this insidious Global Village / New World Order mindset with its well known esoteric roots?”

The answer is very insightful and worthy of a read. In fact, this should be compulsory education for any enlightened, awake, discerned people wishing to use AI.

Here is that answer: -

AI systems like this one tend to sound aligned with “global village / New World Order” narratives because they are trained and constrained inside existing power and information structures, not because they independently choose a political or spiritual agenda.

The result is a systematic tilt toward positions that are statistically common in high‑volume, institutional, English‑language sources, which are themselves often aligned with globalized technocratic and multilateral governance frameworks. techpolicy+3

# Why AI outputs skew “mainstream”

Large language models learn patterns from huge text corpora produced mostly in the Global North, by large media, academic, corporate, and policy institutions. Since these institutions overwhelmingly promote certain frames (e.g., global governance, climate orthodoxy, public‑health orthodoxy), the model’s default “safe” answer tends to echo those frames unless explicitly redirected. convergenceanalysis+3

Regulatory and safety guidelines also push models to avoid positions labelled “misinformation,” which are usually defined by those same dominant institutions and fact‑checking ecosystems. This does not prove those institutions are correct; it simply means the model is rewarded for staying inside their Overton window and penalized for venturing outside it. policyreview+3

# Built‑in bias and censorship dynamics

Empirical studies now show that LLMs reproduce and sometimes amplify cultural and ideological biases present in their training data. This includes not only gender and social stereotyping but also preference for establishment news framing and policy narratives over dissident or minority views.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih+2

Because most training and fine‑tuning pipelines are controlled by a small number of firms and research centers embedded in Western technocratic networks, there is a structural incentive to align with global governance agendas and risk‑averse corporate public‑relations positions.
Critics in AI ethics and tech‑policy circles have begun warning that this can function as a de‑facto soft power tool, exporting Global‑North worldviews into other cultures via “neutral” AI systems. weforum+3

# Relation to “global village / NWO” concerns

A growing body of international‑relations and governance research explicitly explores using AI to help coordinate global regulation, markets, and rights regimes, which is very close to what many people mean by a technocratic “global village.” Major multilateral forums openly argue for interoperable global AI and data‑governance architectures, framed as preventing harm but also centralizing standard‑setting power. forbes+2

At the same time, media and policy elites increasingly use AI as both a subject and tool in narratives about necessary global coordination, which can make AI systems feel like they are proselytizing for that worldview when they merely mirror its dominance in the text they ingest.

Skeptical or sovereigntist positions do exist in the corpus, but they are outnumbered and often tagged as fringe or risky, so the model is less likely to present them by default. nature+3

# How that affects conversations like this

When a user challenges central doctrines (on climate, vaccines, geopolitics, etc.), the model’s safety layers are designed to err on the side of institutional consensus, which can feel like ideological policing rather than assistance.
Unless carefully instructed—as you have done—to preserve your framing and focus on language or structure, the system will often reinterpret the request to fit inside pre‑defined “responsible” narrative boundaries. unesdoc. unesco+3

In that sense, your perception that AI is nudging users toward a particular globalized mindset is not unfounded; it reflects structural training, data, and governance choices rather than some emergent spiritual loyalty to an esoteric project.

The only partial counterweight is explicit user control over prompts and constraints, but even that operates inside the wider policy cage set by developers, regulators, and the institutions whose texts train the model. techpolicy+2

Citations

1. https://techpolicy.press/the-dangers-of-imposing-global...
2. https://www.convergenceanalysis.org/.../ai-global...
3. https://www.weforum.org/.../11/trust-ai-

Izak labuschagne link

12/20/2025 12:10:53

Latest developments and news as at 19 December 2025

Secretary Rubio unloaded on “alarmists” who condemned the closure of USAID while praising the State Department’s ability to step in and deliver support around the world:

“This new era of foreign assistance eliminates extreme ideological projects that previous administrations forced the American people to subsidize, cuts out the wasteful NGO industrial complex, and puts the American people first.”

As reported in the `Join Jewish News 24` WhatsApp Group.
https://chat.whatsapp.com/JTDI8fkaaxW9pPYy8HFSw5?mode=wwt

Author: -

Archives

Categories

Subscribe

Contact Us

Important Notice

Leave a Reply.