Countering the Weaponization of Judicial Systems

Executive Order
Following the signing of an Executive Order by the leader of the free Democratic world, President Donald J Trump, aimed at ending such weaponization as described in the title, there have been several serious developments.

1. Reports of the extent of the weaponization that was committed under the Joe Biden regime started emerging and amounted to thousands of cases right across the USA fast approaching the hundred thousand mark.
2. Moreover, it threw the spotlight on the international arena and exposed a problem which has become endemic pervasive and extremely dangerous.
3. One such case was reported to the Commission of Inquiry granted under an order of The Supreme Court of South Africa in 1995 to Dr. Izak Labuschagne, the head of this consultancy. 
   1. A case involving a person standing for Sheriff in the state of Virginia, who was exposing corruption in their system of justice and campaigning for change was incarcerated under circumstances and proceedings that are frankly shocking.

Commission of Inquiry representation
The Commission researched the matter and made submissions to the President of the USA, The USA Attorneys General as well as the AG of the state of Virginia.  In the submission to President Trump it states: -

• We commend your administration for issuing the Executive Order titled "Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government," acknowledging the critical need to address the erosion of judicial independence in the United States. This step is vital for restoring the integrity of your nation's legal system, which not only upholds justice within your borders but also sets a precedent for democracies worldwide.

The full submission addresses the universal fundamental right of: -

1. Having any matter heard in an appropriate independent and impartial forum and
2. The right of access to and case law in preparation for a defence and the means to properly  generate and produce such defence.

It has always been contra bonos mores (contrary to the moral fibre of the law) to appear before the accused when it comes to administrative irregularities. The principal of the process for review of bias or administrative irregularity, is based on the matter being heard by independent judges.

When the contrary happens it sends shockwaves through any community, immediately eroding confidence in the system of justice and as such, becomes an issue which is squarely in the public interest. The population intervening in such cases is the manifestation of the age old principal of actio popularis. In the USA it manifests as Amicus (curiae) Briefs and indeed, such are the manifestations in the case in point. 

Strategic Planning in such a case 
This is a strategic planning consultancy that takes into consideration all three realities, these being the commercial, Political and Legal realities as described on the home page. As it is not a law firm it does not charge for legal advice or represent persona in court, whether individuals or juristic. When it does levy fees it does so for strategies addressing all three those realities together. Something which is never an easy task. 

As will be noted, all three realities are addressed in that presentation. Addressing the commercial involves setting up corporate structures to procure funding and then properly apply them to fulfil a strategy aimed at creating political pressure through populous mass actions  to the legal realities represented by the courts, AG`s and President etc. Modern AI technologies were used to generate draft Amicus Briefs with associated arguments for the concerned populous to use. This will of course ultimately be refined by professionally staffed research and training facilities developed under the commercial corporate structures. Facilities that should remain in place as insurance against the resurgence of similar problems of course.

The de-radicalisation and rehabilitation facilities envisaged under the Actio Popularis division of Dr. Labuschagne`s International Reset Freedom initiative should of course arise from the commercial strategy detailed in his commission`s representation to the President. One can only hope that suitable and effective collaborative efforts will evolve in this instance.

For those interested please download the full submission {HERE}

Some related links of interest follow: -

Related websites of the sheriff and his collaborators: -

https://peacemakersheriff.org/who-we-are/
https://restoregrandjuryrights.org/
https://peacemakersheriff.org/sheriff-candidate-removed-from-court-seeking-justice/
 
Actio Popularis Telegram Channel
invite link -  ​https://t.me/+OPp6Q__8l-AzYjhl 

Should you wish to get involved please don not hesitate to contact Dr. Labuschagne through the Email  address at [email protected] or on mobile networks through +61 452578992.
Once you have saved that number to your contacts you should be able to call via the ccellular networks or social networks such as What App, Signal, Telegram or Face Book Messenger.