|
Back to Blog
The Arrogance of Entitlement: Neocolonialism, Judicial Overreach, and the Erosion of Sovereignty4/17/2025 In a powerful critique of neo-colonial attitudes in geopolitical engagements, a recent Facebook post by a Pacific Island academic (Transform Aqorau is with Sam Finikaso) exposed the pervasive disrespect faced by smaller nations:
“In the shifting geopolitical landscape of the Pacific, it is increasingly evident that some scholars and policymakers from developed nations operate under a misguided assumption—that because we are from small island nations, we are somehow expected to accommodate their every request without question… This is a reflection of a deeply ingrained neocolonial mentality, where the Pacific is still seen as a space that must be made readily available for external actors to study, dissect, and engage with on their own terms… The days of Pacific nations being treated as mere subjects of study, passive actors in global geopolitics, or convenient points of access for external research must end.” This post resonates far beyond academia, reflecting a broader pattern of arrogance and entitlement in global institutions—aid agencies, academic bodies, and judiciaries—that undermine the sovereignty and dignity of nations. As a response to this post by the Academia Edu member Dr. Labuschagne aptly stated: "The issues highlighted here are not confined to academia but permeate international aid, grant funding, and development regimes… Some aid agencies, such as USAID, have been implicated in creating or funding groups that destabilize regions, as seen in the case of Boko Haram in Nigeria. Such actions, coupled with judicial overreach from certain Western institutions that perpetuate these injustices under the guise of humanitarianism, represent a profound betrayal of trust… We must demand accountability and reject frameworks that prioritize external agendas over the well-being and self-determination of our people." This blog post delves into the systemic nature of this disrespect, spotlighting a particularly egregious case of judicial overreach in the U.S., other instances of judicial defiance of public mandates, and the weaponization of institutions that threatens the very freedoms the West claims to champion. Ironically, as Western institutions falter, nations like Russia are increasingly seen as defenders of traditional values, signaling a crisis of legitimacy in the global order. Judicial Overreach: The MS-13 Deportation Case A striking example of judicial arrogance is the 2024 ruling by U.S. District Judge John A. Kronstadt in Doe v. Garland, which ordered the return and release of deported MS-13 gang members and other hardened criminals to the United States. These individuals, deported to countries like El Salvador, were detained upon arrival by local authorities to protect public safety. Kronstadt’s ruling, grounded in claims of due process violations, mandated that the U.S. government facilitate their return and release, effectively overriding the sovereign decisions of foreign nations to safeguard their citizens. Not to mention the seditious sabotage of the overwhelming mandate of the electorate to the current administration. The White House Press Secretary, Karoline Leavitt, addressed this ruling in a April 16 2025 briefing, emphasizing the administration’s commitment to border security and deportation policies aligned with public safety. Leavitt noted that the ruling undermined efforts to curb illegal immigration and gang violence, reflecting a disconnect between judicial decisions and the electorate’s priorities, as evidenced by the 2024 election results favouring stricter immigration controls. (see the briefing here) This case exemplifies a broader trend of U.S. judges issuing rulings that clash with the mandates of the administration elected by a significant majority in 2024. For instance, in United States v. Texas (2023), a federal judge blocked Texas’s attempt to enforce state-level immigration laws, citing federal supremacy, despite widespread public support for state-led border security measures. Similarly, in Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2024), a judge halted border wall construction, disregarding the administration’s electoral promise to prioritize national security. These decisions highlight a judiciary acting as an unelected counterforce to democratic will, fuelling perceptions of elitist overreach. So bad is this insidious epidemic that the House GOP approved a bill to restrict the political overreach of judges following no less that 67 such cases. See that report here Weaponization of Institutions: A Systemic Crisis The arrogance seen in judicial rulings mirrors the behaviour of academic institutions and aid agencies, which often impose external agendas on sovereign nations. Academic research in the Pacific, as the Facebook post noted, frequently treats local institutions as mere facilitators, ignoring their expertise and priorities. A 2020 study in The Journal of Pacific History critiques this dynamic, arguing that Western researchers often frame Pacific nations as passive subjects, perpetuating neo-colonial power imbalances. Aid agencies like USAID have faced similar criticism. A 2019 report by the Centre for Global Development revealed that USAID’s funding in Nigeria in fact supported terrorist organizations linked to Boko Haram, destabilizing the region under the guise of humanitarian aid. The same Boko Haram that herded Christian into churches and set them alight while the left wing media ignored the news flat. Such actions reflect a disregard for local contexts, prioritizing donor agendas over national stability. The imposition of conditionalities—tying aid to reforms that clash with cultural values—further erodes sovereignty, as seen in World Bank programs mandating privatization in Pacific nations despite local resistance. This weaponization of institutions—judiciaries, academia, and aid agencies—threatens the freedoms championed by the West. When unelected judges override democratic mandates, when academics treat sovereign nations as research playgrounds, and when aid agencies destabilize regions, the legitimacy of Western governance models crumbles. The result is a crisis of trust, with profound implications for global stability. Russia as a Guardian of Traditional Values? Ironically, as Western institutions falter, nations like Russia are gaining traction as defenders of traditional values. A 2025 RT article quotes Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stating, “More and more people in the West are looking at Russia as a country that protects traditional values, which are being eroded by globalist agendas”. This perception, while controversial, stems from Russia’s resistance to Western-imposed cultural and political norms, appealing to those disillusioned by judicial overreach and institutional arrogance in the West. The RT article highlights Russia’s appeal to conservative audiences in Europe and the U.S., who view its emphasis on sovereignty and cultural preservation as a counterpoint to Western progressivism. While this narrative requires critical scrutiny, it underscores the depth of disillusionment with Western governance models. Rome Burning: The Hyper-Left’s Ideological Overreach The metaphor of “Rome burning” captures the urgency of this crisis. The heinous stench of arrogance—emanating from judicial rulings that defy public will, academic practices that demean sovereign nations, and aid policies that destabilize regions—threatens the foundations of freedom. Yet, as the original Facebook post focused on neo-colonial arrogance, it is clear this problem permeates even deeper, infiltrating the judicial and academic spheres of the hyper-left. This ideological cohort, driven by a zeal to proselytize, seeks to impose its misguided doctrines on sovereign nations and dissenting publics alike, often under the guise of progress or humanitarianism. In academia, hyper-left scholars push narratives that dismiss traditional values and local agency, framing non-Western nations as subjects requiring ideological reform. In the judiciary, judges like Kronstadt exemplify this trend, issuing rulings that prioritize abstract ideals over practical realities, such as public safety in the MS-13 case. These actions reflect a broader mission to convert others to their ideological follies, disregarding cultural contexts and democratic mandates. The result is a pandemic of disrespect and overreach that alienates allies, erodes trust, and fuels the appeal of alternative powers like Russia. Without urgent reform—demanding accountability from judiciaries, fostering equitable academic partnerships, and reorienting aid to respect sovereignty—the West risks ceding its moral and geopolitical legitimacy. The freedoms it claims to uphold will collapse under the weight of its own contradictions, leaving a fractured global order in its wake. References
Back to Blog
Personal letter from President Trump4/13/2025 The letter from President Trump to me, featured here, speaks for itself. (- Scroll to the bottom to download ) As Aldo DiBelardino, the Peace Maker Sheriff who spent 66 days in jail as a political prisoner of the far left`s (George Soros Funded) weaponised system commented: - `We crossed the Rubicon so to speak and evils reign is rapidly ending 🙏...that being said there is much to overcome.` Pamela Burnham who has been co-ordinating the various teams and Zoom conferences to assist Aldo for so long wrote in an email to me: - `Very well said. It seems they are indeed aware of both your concerns and ours. It will take time, but we remain hopeful that there is still enough time to see the mission through. Thank you for writing to President Trump and for including concerns on behalf of so many of us. You offered a wealth of thoughtful insight and powerful suggestions — not only for the betterment of America, but for the world at large. I truly thank God for incredible people like you — those who have been standing firm in this fight for far too long, and those who are now stepping in with renewed strength and purpose. May God continue to bless His people and guide us all in these critical days. With gratitude and blessings,` When the President of the country that leads the free world acknowledges one`s work, it is very encouraging indeed. Especially in the face of the many detractors that try so desperately to minimise the immense amount of research, compilation and effort that goes into such activism.
Back to Blog
Overview
This AI assisted initiative raises profound concerns about judicial accountability in the United States and how it affects the rest of the free world. It draws comparisons with systems like Judicial Service Commissions and fundamental rights constitutions in countries such as South Africa, New Zealand, and Canada, and tying it to SCOTUS Justice Scalia’s discussion of the grand jury as a "constitutional fixture" in United States v. Williams (1992). For the USA it envisions a "fourth branch" of government—potentially rooted in Scalia’s view of the grand jury’s independence—as a mechanism to hold the judiciary accountable, suggesting it could be re-established or expanded to address corruption, political weaponization, and lack of oversight. It also highlights the urgency of this initiative, its international ramifications, and the massive organizational effort required, including leveraging the actio popularis doctrine (a legal principle allowing individuals to act in the public interest). We asked how AI could assist, seeking recommendations on structure, funding estimates, proposed legislation, and additional considerations. The file which can be viewed [HERE] address the query systematically, focusing on AI’s potential role and providing actionable first-step ("knee-jerk") recommendations. While Scalia didn’t explicitly advocate for a "fourth branch" in the modern bureaucratic sense, his view of the grand jury as a distinct, people-driven entity provides a conceptual anchor for this proposal. We can assume that this "fourth branch" could either revive the grand jury’s role or create a new accountability body, so this inquiry tailors AI’s contributions accordingly. Summary This initiative could redefine U.S. governance, but it hinges on rapid mobilization and AI’s ability to scale human effort effectively. The world is indeed watching—failure to act could embolden rogue judiciaries everywhere. The economic fall-out could be almost endless. The potential of leveraging judicial reforms and international legislative frameworks in creating real, credible and effective Aid Agency, donor and funding structures to uplift and empower communities in developing countries like in Melanesia is immense. That in itself has immense potential and will result in an important initiative as a spin-off from this one. One already under significant research and development by ISPS and its collaborators. In fact, as this consultancy has always claimed, the three realities of Commercial, Political and Legal, need always to be properly assessed and seen from sufficient perspective in order to build effective strategies. However, to exploit this extremely unique and rare window of opportunity, one would need to exercise a great deal of circumspection, tact, and discernment on all levels. Yet another reason why one must pick one`s collaborators with all the experience, aptitude, wisdom and care that one can muster. Izak Labuschagne
Back to Blog
Overview
At ISPS, we’re not just about Strategically Planning for the introduction of corporates aimed at powering homes with clean energy—we’re about powering ideas that change the game. Today, we’re thrilled to share a Comprehensive Strategic Plan for Vanuatu, a blueprint that doesn’t just solve local challenges but positions Vanuatu as a trailblazer for nations with shared values and demographics. It’s a plan that turns the spotlight on the type of disclosures, exposure and strategies emanating from the USA`s DOGE, reins in undue influence, and redefines development on terms that honour culture over conditionality and creates real strategies to deal with the issues. Real Strategies that take into consideration the Commercial. Political and Legal realities, as is our trademark. Strategies that have real prospects for success. Strategies absolutely necessary at a time like this. Vanuatu as a Beacon Vanuatu, with its 94% Christian demographic and family-centric ethos, isn’t just a small Pacific nation—it’s a proving ground. Our plan envisions it leading a movement for countries facing similar pressures: corruption in aid, external agendas clashing with traditional values, and economic dependence on questionable financiers. By tackling these head-on, Vanuatu can show the world how to blend progress with principle, inspiring places from Fiji to Poland. Leveraging DOGE’s Wake-Up Call The USA’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has pulled back the curtain on waste and influence-peddling in agencies like USAID—think billions misspent on dubious projects or propaganda disguised as aid. Our plan harnesses this momentum. By rooting out fraud and misallocation, Vanuatu can save millions, redirecting those funds to solar-powered schools, rural clinics, and community jobs. It’s not just thrift—it’s a rejection of the strings that come with corruption, turning savings into sovereignty. Shielding Values from Risky Conditionalities UN and USAID programs often come with baggage—conditionalities pushing DEI, gender dysphoria, or neoliberalism that grate against Vanuatu’s Christian core. Our strategy flips the script: A Values-Based Review Board to vet every aid dollar, rejecting anything misaligned with local beliefs. New laws to ban propaganda and social engineering sneaking in under “development” guise. Education campaigns via church networks to spot and stop incursions before they take root. This isn’t insulation for its own sake—it’s a shield for the 94% who call Vanuatu home on their terms. Smarter Terms, Stronger Deals The plan doesn’t stop at saying “no” to bad aid—it rewrites the rules of engagement. Take MIGA (Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency) arrangements: we propose language that prioritizes cultural integrity and ethical investment over generic risk coverage. Funding agreements get a facelift too—clauses demanding transparency on donor intent, barring ideological riders, and favouring local control. The payoff? Deals that fuel growth (like our DPD / SSS project) without compromising identity, setting a precedent others can copy. Values in Action: Corporate, Political, Legal This isn’t pie-in-the-sky—it’s grounded in Vanuatu’s realities: Corporate: Collaboration beats competition. We’re building a model where businesses like DPD thrive by uplifting communities, not exploiting them—think solar grids sparking adjunct industries like agro-processing. Political: Stability through integrity. Frequent government shifts are a challenge, but aligning leaders with a corruption-free, values-first agenda (backed by grassroots faith communities) can steady the ship. Legal: Enforcement with teeth. Strengthening the Ombudsman and Foreign Investment Act ensures accountability isn’t just a word—it’s a wall against external overreach. The Full Picture—Yours to Explore This blog scratches the surface. The Comprehensive Strategic Plan for Vanuatu—a paginated, indexed, tabulated PDF—lays it all out: timelines, partners (think Samaritan’s Purse or Templeton Trust), and a Vanuatu Values Trust to rally global support. Download it here and see how we’re aiming for 2029, with Vanuatu not just surviving but leading. Join the Movement Vanuatu’s rise isn’t a solo act—it’s a spark for nations tired of bending to agendas that don’t fit. At ISPS, we’re all in—using energy innovation to power this vision while staying true to what matters.
Comment below or reach out—let’s make this a global win. ____________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Izak Labuschagne Founder, ISPS | Director, DPD
Back to Blog
Summary:
The Road Accident Victims Support Trust is a pivotal initiative aimed at supporting low-income and indigent victims of road accidents in South Africa, where the Road Accident Fund (RAF) often falls short. This blog explores our strategy to provide medical, psychological, and financial assistance while advocating for systemic reforms. Our comprehensive approach includes a detailed business plan, legal framework, and funding strategies. Key Highlights: Mission: To bridge the gap in RAF support, offering holistic aid to victims. Services:
Funding: A mix of -
Impact: Aimed at assisting 250 beneficiaries in the first five years, with a focus on transparency and impact measurement. Documents and Access: Full Project Document - Download Here - (Password protected) Password: Provided upon payment of the invoice or signature of ISPS's standard agreements at ISPS's discretion. Abbreviated Table of Contents:
Please note that the above is extremely abbreviated and that the full table of contents is 11 pages in length Over 91 pages of extremely well researched, detailed and substantive material Conclusion Invoice with Notes: - View Invoice Notes: Includes breakdown of consultation fees for strategic planning, with provisions for discounts and payment terms. Payment of the invoice will grant access to the password-protected document. Engagement with ISPS: To access the full document, please adhere to one of the following:
This project not only aims to aid those in dire need but also to push for change in the RAF system, ensuring a more equitable and supportive environment for all road accident victims in South Africa. Join us in this journey towards recovery and justice.
Back to Blog
The latest executive order of president Donald Trump entitled Addressing Egregious Actions of The Republic of South Africa, comments by Elon Musk in respect of being unable to deploy Starlink to South Africa because of the Black Economic Empowerment laws, and the submission by an independent Commission of Inquiry to President Trump and Elon Musk casts a prescient spotlight on this topic.
The question that arises is this: - How can International Strategic Planning contribute to remedying what should be the obvious Commercial Political and legal consequences and fall out of policies and laws that require such drastic intervention by the leader of the free world? The answer to that is simple. It is to come up with workable strategies to mitigate the inherent risk in such policies. To pivot from Retribution and Regression to Reformation and Reconstruction as the slogan contained in that submission suggests. The submission contains some hints of what can be leveraged in the existing scenario to alleviate what are quite obviously going to be major economic repercussions for such myopic policies, and laws. However, that is not even to fully explore strategies to mitigate the massive bond market fall -out for banking or the implications of the junk bonds and their associated derivatives risks as emerges from the submission. For those International Strategic Planners that have the necessary acumen, this situation presents opportunities to make contributions that will have long lasting implications in our global landscape. As a result, this consultancy looks forward to collaborating to the ends of making the world safer, more stable and vastly more prosperous.
Back to Blog
Executive Order
Following the signing of an Executive Order by the leader of the free Democratic world, President Donald J Trump, aimed at ending such weaponization as described in the title, there have been several serious developments.
Commission of Inquiry representation The Commission researched the matter and made submissions to the President of the USA, The USA Attorneys General as well as the AG of the state of Virginia. In the submission to President Trump it states: -
It has always been contra bonos mores (contrary to the moral fibre of the law) to appear before the accused when it comes to administrative irregularities. The principal of the process for review of bias or administrative irregularity, is based on the matter being heard by independent judges. When the contrary happens it sends shockwaves through any community, immediately eroding confidence in the system of justice and as such, becomes an issue which is squarely in the public interest. The population intervening in such cases is the manifestation of the age old principal of actio popularis. In the USA it manifests as Amicus (curiae) Briefs and indeed, such are the manifestations in the case in point. Strategic Planning in such a case This is a strategic planning consultancy that takes into consideration all three realities, these being the commercial, Political and Legal realities as described on the home page. As it is not a law firm it does not charge for legal advice or represent persona in court, whether individuals or juristic. When it does levy fees it does so for strategies addressing all three those realities together. Something which is never an easy task. As will be noted, all three realities are addressed in that presentation. Addressing the commercial involves setting up corporate structures to procure funding and then properly apply them to fulfil a strategy aimed at creating political pressure through populous mass actions to the legal realities represented by the courts, AG`s and President etc. Modern AI technologies were used to generate draft Amicus Briefs with associated arguments for the concerned populous to use. This will of course ultimately be refined by professionally staffed research and training facilities developed under the commercial corporate structures. Facilities that should remain in place as insurance against the resurgence of similar problems of course. The de-radicalisation and rehabilitation facilities envisaged under the Actio Popularis division of Dr. Labuschagne`s International Reset Freedom initiative should of course arise from the commercial strategy detailed in his commission`s representation to the President. One can only hope that suitable and effective collaborative efforts will evolve in this instance. For those interested please download the full submission {HERE} Some related links of interest follow: - Related websites of the sheriff and his collaborators: - https://peacemakersheriff.org/who-we-are/ https://restoregrandjuryrights.org/ https://peacemakersheriff.org/sheriff-candidate-removed-from-court-seeking-justice/ Actio Popularis Telegram Channel invite link - https://t.me/+OPp6Q__8l-AzYjhl Should you wish to get involved please don not hesitate to contact Dr. Labuschagne through the Email address at [email protected] or on mobile networks through +61 452578992. Once you have saved that number to your contacts you should be able to call via the ccellular networks or social networks such as What App, Signal, Telegram or Face Book Messenger. |
RSS Feed
